Advertisement

Forced-Labor Hearing Begins, Paving Way for More Trump Tariffs

A three-day U.S. trade hearing is beginning on proposed tariffs tied to foreign forced-labor enforcement, a move that could restore or expand Trump-era import duties.

Containers at the Port of Oakland in Oakland, California. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Key Insights

  • The U.S. Trade Representative recommends adding 10% or 12.5% tariffs on imports from 60 countries found to have inadequate forced-labor import prohibitions.
  • Governments, industry groups and human rights organizations will argue both for and against the tariffs, with disputes over their legal basis, economic impact and effectiveness.
  • The hearings could shape a major expansion of U.S. tariffs affecting sectors including steel, seafood, energy, textiles, footwear, cookware, and medical devices.

(Bloomberg) — A three-day hearing on the US Trade Representative’s latest plan to impose tariffs on major trading partners kicks off in Washington on Tuesday.

The U.S. launched an investigation into the forced-labor prohibition policies of 60 countries in March, citing a law that authorizes tariffs on countries deemed to unfairly burden US commerce. That basis is viewed as more legally sound than the emergency power President Donald Trump used last year to impose tariffs that were ruled illegal by the Supreme Court in February.

The USTR determined in early June that each of the investigated economies failed to “impose and effectively enforce a forced labor import prohibition,” and recommended that goods imported into the U.S. from those economies face an additional 10% or 12.5% duty..

As part of the process, dozens of stakeholders will make their case — for or against the duties — to U.S. trade officials. White House officials have already made it clear that they plan to use the forced labor and other investigations to restore import taxes to levels in place under Trump’s emergency tariffs.

In the meantime, the administration has a temporary 10% global tariff in place that expires later this month.

A separate USTR hearing on Brazilian policies and practices is also taking place this week, and Flávio Bolsonaro, Brazilian senator and son of the former President Jair Bolsonaro, is slated to testify to Tuesday. He is expected to urge the Trump administration not to impose new tariffs on Brazilian exports before the October election or target Pix, the country’s popular instant-payment system.

“The proposed tariffs would reward the very offenders they are meant to punish,” Bolsonaro wrote in a filing to USTR, arguing that the measures would benefit President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, whose popularity rose after casting earlier US pressure as an attack on Brazil’s sovereignty.

Tuesday

Up first in the forced-labor lineup, USTR will hear from a panel of government officials, including Mexico’s Ernesto Acevedo Fernández, on “how Mexico’s USMCA Forced Labor Mechanism effectively enforces our forced-labor import prohibition.”

Diplomats and trade officials from Chile, Ecuador, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras and Peru are also set to speak.

The second panel on Tuesday will feature the American Line Pipe Producers Association and the Steel Manufacturers Association. The groups will testify in favor of duties to counter what they call a flood of imports of steel mill and steel containing products, in part drive by low labor standards and the absence of import bans on goods produced with forced labor. 

The American Petroleum Institute will ask USTR to drop duties on industrial inputs that are critical to the oil and gas industry, which the lobby group says have no link to forced labor and “simply cannot be sourced domestically either at all, or in sufficient quantities, by the industry responsible for meeting the Trump Administration’s aim of US energy dominance.”

Later on, a former USTR official will argue that these investigations betray the intended uses of Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, according to prepared testimony shared with Bloomberg News.

“Senior administration officials have described their purpose as not to address unreasonable ‘acts, policies, and practices’ burdening U.S. commerce, but to recreate the tariff rates set under last year’s illegal ‘IEEPA’ decrees,” said Ed Gresser, who is now vice president and director for trade and global markets at the Progressive Policy Institute. 

Gresser is set to argue that the USTR’s report does not prove that the listed economies buy imports of goods made with forced labor, nor that they impose a burden on American commerce. “Therefore, the tariffs it recommends — again, roughly $100 billion a year in new costs for Americans — are inappropriate and ought not to stand,” Gresser said.  

Wednesday

On Wednesday, the Coalition for Fair Trade in Seafood will call for an additional higher rate on seafood from Vietnam, especially in the processing industry, which the group says is particularly vulnerable to forced and child labor.

Representatives from India, Jordan and Pakistan are also scheduled to speak.

Pakistan’s representative is expected to argue the USTR’s recommendations are “disproportionate given the absence of evidence of forced labor in Pakistani export goods and Pakistan’s enactment of an import prohibition.”

Human rights groups including China Labor Watch are supposed to testify. China Labor Watch will argue that “any preferential tariff treatment, including the proposed textile mechanism or similar sector-specific mechanisms, should apply only to products that can be credibly and independently verified to be free from forced labor.”

Thursday

The hearings will wrap up with comments from the Footwear Distributors & Retailers of America (FDRA) and the National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO), joined on the panel by the American Cotton Producers.

Government representatives from South Korea, Sri Lanka and South Africa will also speak on the panel, including a representative from Vietnam who will take issue with the finding that the country “has failed to impose and effectively enforce measures addressing goods associated with forced labor.” 

Finally, trade officials will hear testimony from a cross-section of the US economy including the American Trailer Manufacturers Coalition, cookware brand Le Creuset, the Cigar Association of America and medical device companies.

Le Creuset pointed out in a filing to USTR the company employs nearly 800 people in the US, despite not manufacturing their cookware domestically. Their enameled cast iron cookware product “presents no risk to American manufacturing due to the fact that there is no comparable domestic production of such premium enameled cast iron cookware to satisfy the demand,” the company said.

More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Want to add your voice to the conversation? Email caletha@hgi.io with story tips or insights.

Share

ADVERTISEMENT

6287028938343890019

Ready to Get the Extra Edge?

Join a global network of supply chain and sourcing professionals who are turning intelligence into action. Share insights and stay ahead in a rapidly evolving industry.

Turning Supply Chain Insights into Action

Sign up to the HGI newsletter for actionable business insights.